Final+Push+module+6+-+throw+thoughts+and+ideas+here

Guys I thought this may be easier than email. Table is outstanding issues, please update as we complete tasks. Documents are on the bottom of the page.

What we still need



Are we tying any demographic data to it? ||  ||   || 5 Barriers: personal attitudes costs availability distrust advertsing || ==== ==== || //Do American consumers who desire to practice a green lifestyle choose environmentally friendly cleaning products?// The supporting question was //If these consumers want to live an green life style but still chose cleaning products that were not environmentally friendly, did factors such as cost or greenwashing affect their decision?//
 * Question/Issue || Task || Assigned To || Additional Info || Complete? ||
 * Exactly what are we analyzing – are we just saying that the results yielded our hypothesis, that they are not shopping green and the five barriers are the cause?
 * This is the specific question that was investigated:

So, has anyone correlated the instances when people bought swiffers with other attitude data?

Do we need more of a lit review on the actualy selection of cleaning products, and which are the most harmful?

Should the weighting on that question be based on how bad the product is for the environment - that way if they chose several products we could graph the "badness"? ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Based on the literature review, the study will focus on the five barriers identified by Bonini and Oppenheim (2008): cost, lack of advertising, availability, distrust, and negative perceptions of companies selling green cleaning products.

We should probably talk to all of those points in our report (with graphs, etc). ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * I think some of the stuff we had in the other template was more research planning information, so I don't think it should go in our final report (i.e. how we plan to analyze the data, rather I added the section on how we are analyzing it). ||  ||   ||   || In Gina's latest template the planning section is an Appendix ||
 * We still need a discussion section about the data and a conclusion. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * I also need to figure out where some more table can be added and what information to put into them. One of the example reports that he has simply puts the Likert scale questions in a table with the percentage of answers for each response. That could be an option for the sections on the factors and would be pretty easy. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * I had a little trouble also figuring out what he means by "data findings" vs. "data results." ||  ||   ||   || Check O'Leary p 275 (the table) ||
 * Do we want to do the abstract now, and pull it out before we turn it in Sat? That way we are effectively done ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * We need to include some of the info Robyn dinged us for on the last report in the methods section. Why did we settle on cleaning products? ||  ||   ||   || In Gina's latest draft ||
 * Need more verbiage in Data Collection Methods Phase I ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * . Need graphs for all...visually represent the data. I think it may be interesting to see if there are correlation in census data or in some of the attitude data for the 19% who don't buy any green products. Or some other correlations. ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Shoud we compare the data that we collected with some of the data from the corn report? ||  ||   ||   || (Lorrie your email said it was attached, but I didn't see it...can you attach here - or send to me & I'll do it..?) ||
 * Rework the survey instrument to make readable per Robyn ||  || LG ||   || Done and posted below ||

documents
survey instrument in word tables (made individual tables for each question (1-11) as in the zoomerang survey:

Gina's latest, everything ported over to Tristan's template x L D de>en Google C  barriers